NET 0 TrackerGreenhouse Gas Emissions
Last 3 Years Emissions Data Summary
| Y2021 | Y2019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 7,000,000 | NA |
| Scope 2 - location-based | NA | NA |
| Scope 2 - market-based | 376,000 | NA |
| Scope 1-2 - location-based | 7,000,000 | 0 |
| Scope 1-2 - market-based | 7,376,000 | NA |
| Scope 3 | 66,199,999 | 243,200 |
| Total - location-based | 73,199,999 | 243,200 |
| Total - market-based | 73,575,999 | NA |
Note: Data sources detailed here
| Y2022 | |
|---|---|
| Total CO2e estimate (by Net0Tracker) | 79,976,565 |
| Methodology | Pre-calculated sector intensity (revenue) |
Carbon emissions are estimated according to comparable years, intensity and sector benchmarks
Performance vs. Target
Value Chain (scope 3) Emissions by Category
Emissions Trajectory (Full Scopes)
Emissions Trajectory not available
Sector Benchmark
Note: Latest GHG and revenue data (based on tradingview.com) are used to calculate GHG emissions intensity by sector. The color scale of each bubble depends on the GHG intensity (GHG emissions per 1 million USD revenue). Sectors follow the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) that organize companies based on their primary business activities. The 11 sectors are : Information Technology, Health Care, Financials, Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services, Industrials, Consumer Staples, Energy, Utilities, Real Estate, and Materials.
Sempra Energy belongs to the sector Utilities.
Offsets
Last update for Sempra Energy by zerotracker.net: June 23, 2025| Planning to use external offset credits | Yes |
| Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | No |
| Conditions on use of offset credits |
|
| Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Yes (CCS-based removals e.g. BECCS, DACCS) |
Additional notes: "Sempra headquarters and Sempra California offices and service centers strive to operate with renewable electricity, either through generating renewable power on-site, using renewable energy from the grid, purchasing renewable energy credits or subscribing to renewable or green tariffs where available by local utilities." pp52-53 "Even in a state of “net zero,” GHG emissions would likely still be generated, but with innovation and continued development of new technology and solutions, it can allow an equal amount of carbon dioxide or its equivalent to be removed from the atmosphere, resulting in a zero increase in overall net emissions" p49 Commercial scale CCS facilities in plan for 2025 - 2035 (p55) "Sempra Infrastructure continues to evaluate the development of carbon capture and sequestration projects: Hackberry Carbon Capture and Sequestration (HCS) and Titan Carbon Sequestration (TCS). The HCS project is designed to permanently sequester carbon dioxide emissions from the Cameron LNG Phase 1 facility and the proposed Cameron LNG Phase 2 project. The TCS project in Texas has the potential to capture CO2 from Port Arthur LNG operations and unlock additional emissions reduction pathways. The proposed project would benefit from the acquisition in 2023 of approximately 38,000 acres of pore space, and its proximity to the Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 construction project, offering strategic advantages for CO2 transport and storage. " p104
Score Summary
| Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Transparency | 0.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | |
| 4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Commitments | 0.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 | |
| 8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 7.5 | 10.0 | 7.5 |
| Results | 7.5 | 30.0 | 7.5 | |
| Total | 7.5 | 100.0 | 7.5 |
Score Details
| Criteria | Results | 2024 Score | 2023 Score | Vs. 2023 | 2022 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
| Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
| Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
| What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | F | 0.0 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
| Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
| What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | NC | 0.0 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
| Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: 1.8°C | 7.5 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 7.5 | |
| Total | 7.5 / 100.0 | 0.0 | 7.5 | ||
Available Data Sources
| Reporting Year | 2021 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Yourstake | Yourstake |
| Publication Year | unknown | 2020 |
| Scope 1 | 7,000,000 | NA |
| Scope 2 - location-based | NA | NA |
| Scope 2 - market-based | 376,000 | NA |
| Scope 1-2 - location-based | 7,000,000 | 0 |
| Scope 1-2 - market-based | 7,376,000 | NA |
| Scope 3 | 66,199,999 | 243,200 |
| Total - location-based | 73,199,999 | 243,200 |
| Total - market-based | 73,575,999 | NA |
Sources
- Yourstake: Data from YourStake.org - see Free SFDR data library